President
Obama's State of the Union
address last night struck a responsive cord in me. Predictably, many
Republicans objected to the President's plan to finance upgrading the
nation's infrastructure, educational system, etc. by increasing the
taxes on the richest of the rich. Or by imposing federal taxes on
those Americans who move their business offshore and pay no taxes at
all.
Such
objections bring to memory certain of my fellow Idahoans a decade
ago, who insisted on driving their cars on public roads without
paying to register those cars. Some even designed their own unique
license plates to proclaim their freedom. The roads are there,
they reasoned, free for everyone to drive. Whoever built them or maintains them is
irrelevant to the present moment.
The
claim has been made that the richest 80 individuals in America own as much as
the whole lower financial half of the American population combined.
Seems pretty wild. Be that accurate or not, there are quite a few
billionaires, increasing their wealth by several million dollars per
year, while millions of working Americans do not earn enough to feed
their children adequately or pay the rent. Let alone those in many foreign
nations who subsist on less than two dollars per day.
Many
business higher-ups explain that they are worth what they receive
because of all the jobs they create, or the charitable foundations
they fund. And in some cases they really have enabled whole nations
to be free of, say, river blindness or guinea worm, or have funded
better education or small business start-ups.
I
think that the basic conundrum such explanations ignore is best
illustrated by a problem brought to light in the Wisconsin summer
resort where I worked in my student days. We served two sittings each
meal, about 300 people at a sitting. The view over Green Lake was
spectacular, the cooking was good, the people congenial, ten at each
table, served family style.
A conference speaker once noted that each table was served a
platter of ten pork chops, (or whatever was on the menu), passed from
person to person. If one person helped himself to four of the chops,
that meant three other people got none, despite his assurance that he
gave a lot to charity. Or management's promise to order more pork
chops next time.
I
think that's what, in Bible times, was called a parable.
No comments:
Post a Comment